Paleontology is the study of fossils of plants and animals, mainly about petrified remains.
It is known that everything petrifies. It can be very hard teeth or tar (amber). The science wrongly believes that amber is fossilized resin, although in reality amber is a petrified fossil mumiyo.
When a pseudo-paleontologist looks at the imprint of a plant or an animal on the stone, then for some reason he does not see that in front of him there is a fossilized piece of nature of that time, on which, to be exact – in which there is still a petrified wood or a bird. A necessary and sufficient condition for the appearance of this print in a stone is conservation, mummification for a long time of an organic object in the soil of the time when this biological object lived.
All soil, all nature petrifies.
Basalt, granite, marble, limestone, clay, sand, and so on – everything was once hydrogen, organic and water.
Reading the works of your paleontologists, I did not catch the thread of reasoning, according to which they separate the fossils of plants and animals from the fossilized nature of the time. It seems that they just do not see the super-obvious fact of the gradual global fossilization of nature.
Why do notthey see it and how is it possible, I do not understand.
Paleontology is just a fake.
Precious and semi-precious stones, minerals and deposits, nuggets, including gold – all these are living stones, “growing” on hydrogen, water, organic matter, carbon dioxide and other “edible” gases, on each other and on all that they “liked”.
That is geology and other geosciences are also fakes.