Yes, at the whole we all can read. But it’s hardly a satisfactory argument in favour of intelligence in the XXI century. But people are proud of themselves! For example, scholars enchanted by the degree of their intelligence strive to get in contact with space «brothers in mind» anywise. – Here we are! We are here! We are such swells, we are so nice babies! That’s the main contents of the «telegrams» that people from time to time send to the four winds into the space. Let us see what we know about space that we terrorize with our messages so diligently. And what can «brothers in mind» say about our intelligence according to the results of knowledge tests. Let’s analyse our image of near space. For example, of the Moon. Our science knows and teaches everyone that the Moon rotates around the Earth and attracts water of the Earth world ocean. In the result of this, inhabitants of the coastline witness low and high tides from time to time. We all live under the conditions of Earth gravity and that’s why we all have body weight. We know that to hover above the earth without any technical meanings it’s necessary to completely lose the weight. It’s not enough to lose part of the weight and become lighter. In other words, the Moon must attract water on the Earth with greater force than the Earth itself so that a water coffin was formed! Water must be weightless all the time during the high tide. But it’s impossible and does not happen! Explanation of the high tides with the Moon attraction is absolute dotage! Moreover, there must be an air «hump» with low pressure inside running in the Earth atmosphere following the Moon, in other words in one direction all the time. And this is rainfall. Wind must be only eastern, because the Moon and the Sun «pull» water horizontally in one direction behind themselves. There is one more moment out of many contradictions: if there exists attraction between the Sun, The Earth and the Moon, life on the Earth should significantly differ when the Moon and the Sun pull vertically in one direction (dark moonphase) from the one when they pull in different directions (fullmoon). However, nothing of this happens! Is universal attraction nonsense or blunder? Whatever you like! And there are lots of such blatant errors in the scientific worldview! Yes, water coffins are really formed in the world ocean depending on motion of the Moon and the Sun along the sky, but it’s not caused by attraction. By the way, there is a host of scientific and non-scientific answers to this issue, beginning with the plain everyday life observations. Ignorance of reasons for high and low tides can’t be an excuse for existence of false doctrines about it! At the same time everybody knows about basic gravity property from the school times (at least it should be known, because it’s taught to everyone) — free fall acceleration doesn’t depend on the body mass! In other words, the Moon doesn’t differentiate water, the Earth, a fluff — if all this is attracted by the Moon it should be attracted the same way. Gravity doesn’t separate! The Moon can’t attract only water! And still there exist a hoard of nonsense that a very big asteroid «tore» atmosphere away from some planet. There appeared space stones of Marsian origin. Damned nonsense! What can science say in its defense? Only that classical thing — all brains leaked across the border. But it’s also a lie! They would have showed themselves even behind the hill — you cannot hide an eel in a sack! But in their textbooks the Moon also attracts water! Thus, there are scarce brains both there and here. Ah, dreams, dreams! But after all let’s imagine that somewhere near cerebellum in our head a little pile of brains lies. Then the idea of lunar attraction of water must arouse a picture under the title Standing cucumbers in our head. Indeed, cucumbers almost completely consist of water! That’s why when the Moon moves above the patch with cucumbers they will inevitably spring to attention! Now there began official talks about reforming Russian Academy of science. Strictly speaking, it doesn’t need to be reformed but dispersed and its members brought to justice even only for the fact that the law of universal gravity is still taught at schools and universities. Everyone, even politicians and judges can check oneself that with the help of fields it’s impossible to execute the rotation of a body around a circle or elliptical trajectory. One can use an ordinary magnet to do it. It’s necessary to tear «epaulets» away from every scholar until they name the reason and propelling force of all universal rotations and, in particular, the reason and propelling force of the Earth rotation around the Sun. By inertia? But a body can’t move by inertia along curving trajectory! Only in a straight line! Are you interested why «brothers in mind» still stubbornly do not appear? – What can they talk with us about? Unfortunately, there are much more examples of «lunar» dotage in the science and education than sensible, kind and eternal things. There is nothing to sow but for thistle! Let’s imagine that a teacher of a village school or a professor of MSU or Harvard come to work, go to the tribune and start elucidating that plants as the result of photosynthesis reactions in the leaves evolve oxygen into the atmosphere and as the result of breathing evolve carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. And at once speak about the fact that for photosynthesis plants consume carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and breathe atmosphere oxygen. Do they hear themselves? Do they understand what they are trumpeting? I really doubt it! They claim that plants throw into the atmosphere the purest high concentrated gases that are allegedly necessary for the vital activity and then they take the same gases back from the atmosphere but with the lower concentration, diluted by other gases, dusty contaminated by disease-inducing microorganisms. For example, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has nearly a zero concentration (0,03%)! Is such a thing possible? Of course no! Nature is not as stupid as people! On this site this and other examples of scientific deceits are viewed in more detail. If you agree or do not agree that not everything is all right in the school textbooks on natural sciences than make comments, argue!